THE EROSION OF AUSTRALIA

If there was ever a time for a wake-up call, it's now. The signs clearly indicate that the principles of the Magna Carta 1215 are being overlooked and overshadowed by overly enthusiastic political ideologies.

I will be explicit in opposing the Australian government's attempt to hold individuals legally accountable for merely offending someone. This is a reprehensible overreach, and those who permitted such laws should be reprimanded and held accountable by the highest court in the country for crimes against humanity and for violating the Magna Carta itself.

The Magna Carta was established to remind the Crown that the people hold the power, and as long as a treaty is in place, both parties must adhere to the rules. It seems the Australian government is losing sight of this principle by permitting "local governments" to consistently exert authority over the people and collect revenue through illegal and unconstitutional laws.

Magna Carta 1215

Our country is composed of individual states, but we are unified under a single constitution that supersedes all state constitutions in legal matters. Any contradiction to this is considered invalid, that includes any "Local or Third tier" government.

This framework is designed to prevent government overreach and safeguard the rights of citizens. Allowing even minor infractions can gradually lead Australia towards becoming more like North Korea or China, which lack the protections provided by the Magna Carta 1215.

As Australians, we have a responsibility, not as political ideologues or spokespersons, but as guardians of these principles, which are the very foundations of our freedom. I'm concerned that too many people take the word and meaning of freedom for granted, and this could lead to Australia's downfall.

I've unfortunately spoken with many individuals who believe that freedom is overrated, viewing it merely as a buzzword or slang for living. These naïve individuals have lost sight of how our civilization has progressed and what has truly brought people genuine peace.

There is a phenomenon that could be characterized as a toxic cult spreading across the nation. This cult promotes a culture of hatred, division, judgment, racism, bigotry, harassment, violence, political ideology, poor leadership, poverty, arrogance, and ignorance.

This situation has arisen alongside what can only be described as a significant influx of foreign influence. Whether this is due to mass immigration and the accompanying religious ideological influence, or whether the declining standards of living, hygiene, and communication have polarized the Australian people into making poor political choices to avoid offending others, remains a question.

A brief look at social media can reveal the current state of affairs, especially when examining comments on topics such as politics, music, spirituality, and movies. The degree of "judgment" is exceptionally high, and there is a noticeable increase in people's sense of entitlement, which has grown alongside rising crime rates and immigration.

I am certain that ideologues will read our blog and might use the terms I've mentioned. However, the team at Radio Washroom is completely indifferent to their opinions. This indifference distinguishes us from others; we don't let emotions sway the facts, nor do we let ideologues and their futile judgments affect us.

In examining the recent Australian election, it's evident that the Australian populace has been neglected. The social media and public sentiment towards the current government are filled with dissatisfaction and disdain. This government seems to have very socialist inclinations and fails to consult or seek permission from the people where it is necessary and expected.

Where do these ideals originate? The push for renewable energy, the claims about climate change, LGBTQI+ activism, racial provocations, concerns about fossil fuels and CO2 levels attributed to human activity, the notion that cows need medication due to emissions, and other similar leftist ideas all seem to come from a common source.

This convergence of social and environmental movements reflects a broader ideological shift that has been gaining momentum over the past several decades.

Upon closer examination, one can clearly see the link between the World Economic Forum (WEF), United Nations (UN), Section 51 of the Australian Constitution, state governments, and the unconstitutional actions of local governments in implementing these 17 sustainability and development goals without the people's consent or awareness.

The World Economic Forum, an influential international organization, has been pivotal in promoting a global agenda that emphasizes sustainability, equity, and social justice, yet the methods are not discussed, as they are insanely unconstitutional in many places, hence their need to "backdoor" the Australian Constitution through the United Nations.

It serves as a platform for leaders from various sectors, including government, business, and civil society, to collaborate on addressing pressing global challenges, Challenges that they them selves, this unelected group of business leaders, have chosen and decided the "solutions" for.. sound familiar?

The sustainability goals, often referred to as the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), were adopted by the United Nations in 2015 and aim to address issues such as poverty, inequality, climate change, environmental degradation, peace, and justice, sounds like a nice plan huh??.. but wait..

These goals have been embraced by various governments and institutions worldwide, including those in Australia, where Section 51 of the Constitution grants the federal government the power to legislate on matters of national interest, this nasty little loophole, defining "National Interest".

The implementation of these goals has raised grave concerns regarding the extent to which unlawful local governments may overstep the constitutional boundaries, often acting without explicit consent from the populace, acting as an authority without so much as having sworn an oath to the people. Furthermore, the conversation about climate change has become more closely linked with social justice movements, resulting in increased activism on topics like so called racial in equality and LGBTQI+ rights. These issues are being vigorously promoted by the same "Socialist" groups across various cities in Australia, supported by the same base.

The narrative that human activities, especially fossil fuel use, are major contributors to climate change has motivated many to push vigorously for a shift to renewable energy sources, leading some to feel justified in mistreating those with differing opinions.

This urgency is intensified by the "alarming statistics" regarding increasing CO2 levels and the environmental effects of livestock farming. This has sparked debates about the necessity for innovative solutions, such as administering medications to cattle to reduce their emissions. However, there is no conclusive evidence to substantiate any of these claims.

The intertwining of various movements forms a complex setting in which economic, environmental, and social issues are perceived through a unified progressive perspective. In Australia, the government promotes the idea that anyone opposing these particular progressive ideals is labeled as far-right or Nazi extremists. Criticizing these ideals is seen as an offense because it is perceived as offending others' feelings by disagreeing with them.

Critics argue that this approach can sometimes overshadow individual rights and local governance, leading to a perception that these changes are being imposed rather than democratically decided upon.

The push for these ideals, while possibly rooted in a desire for positive change, raises questions about the legitimacy of the processes through which they are implemented and the extent to which they reflect the will of the people.

The roots of these modern ideals stem from a combination of global initiatives, constitutional frameworks, and local governance practices that together influence the conversation on sustainability, equality, and environmental responsibility. Throughout this process, there has been no consideration of the will of the Australian people, despite the significant costs of past errors.

Essentially, the Australian government has taken a leap off a cliff, hoping to find a parachute on the way down.

As society continues to navigate these complex issues, it remains essential to critically assess the sources and motivations behind such movements to ensure that they align with democratic principles and the interests of the communities they affect.

When a society persistently weakens the values of patriotism, lawfulness, and loyalty, it becomes easier to implement ideals through these means by hiring individuals unfamiliar with the laws into roles that promote their enforcement. This can inadvertently undermine the democratic process. For instance, in Australia, consider the security guards on trains, council workers, and those lobbying for leadership positions. The number of immigrants unfamiliar with Australian law who are assuming authority over Australians is becoming excessive.

When these issues are reduced to a local level and combined with the increasing ideological pressure online, in schools, and workplaces due to immigration and indoctrination programs, one must wonder how long it will take before people awaken and unite to uphold our constitutional rights—not just for ourselves, but for our children and future generations.

Freedom is not merely an ideology; it is a right that must be defended and preserved, never surrendered or endangered. It is our responsibility to uphold the Magna Carta of 1215 and protect our constitution from adversaries both domestic and foreign.

The question is: Do you know who the enemy is?

Until Next time..

Alboy